All countries

Silfio country intelligence · BIH

Bosnia and Herzegovina

2.0% annual new-conflict probability
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag

How to read these probabilities: Scores estimate the probability of a new armed conflict starting within the next 12 months. Ongoing conflicts can have a saturation effect, reducing the modelled probability of an additional conflict onset. A low or falling score does not imply less severe ongoing fighting or a safer country. Existing conflicts are assessed through scenario analysis.

Population

3.14M

GDP

$32.6B

Currency

BAM

Capital

Sarajevo

Land area

51.21K km²

Official languages

Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian

Risk assessment

Risk profile

The 12-month probability of a new armed-conflict onset in Bosnia and Herzegovina is 2.0%, a low risk. The main long-run factors are the country’s history of the 1992–95 war, unresolved constitutional and ethnic divisions, and fragile state institutions. These are balanced by the absence of a current nationwide armed organisation, the continuing international presence, and the economic and political costs of renewed war.

Recent reporting reviewed provides no indication of armed mobilisation or violence involving Bosnia and Herzegovina’s principal political actors, including state institutions, Republika Srpska authorities, or neighbouring Serbia and Croatia. The available Bosnia-linked report concerns the return of the Spectre computer vulnerability affecting JIT engines, rather than security developments or conflict activity. No prediction markets were found.

The largest uncertainty is whether political confrontation over the distribution of state authority could move from institutional obstruction into organised violence, particularly if outside actors became directly involved. Risk would rise most clearly with armed incidents, mobilisation by domestic security or paramilitary forces, or a breakdown of international deterrence; sustained political compromise and functioning security institutions would lower the likelihood of onset.

Strategic reasoning

  • The 1992–95 war and the Dayton settlement left ethnic and territorial disputes embedded in governance, creating persistent pathways from political crisis to confrontation. At the same time, the absence of an active insurgency or established armed campaign supports the low classification.
  • Current reporting contains no conflict-specific escalation signal. The key stabilising factors are international deterrence, the high costs of renewed war, and the continued operation of state and entity-level institutions.

Critical indicators

  • In the latest reporting reviewed, a Sarajevo-based journalist covered the renewed Spectre CPU vulnerability and attacks on just-in-time engines. This is a cybersecurity development with no reported link to armed actors or violence inside Bosnia and Herzegovina.
  • From 1992 to 1995, Bosnia and Herzegovina experienced a major internal war involving Bosniak, Serb, and Croat forces. That established history continues to support a non-zero onset risk because institutional disputes remain connected to unresolved territorial and identity questions.

Probability trend

How the Bosnia and Herzegovina estimate has moved

Probability2.7%2.4%2.0%

Aug 26

Sep 1

Sep 7

Sep 21

Sep 30

Date

Current conflicts

Source: UCDP

No active conflicts in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Regional context

Bosnia and Herzegovina compared with its neighbours and region

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks number 86 of 195 in new conflict outbreak risk.

Figures are each country's modelled probability of a new armed conflict on its territory within the next 12 months. Select any country to open its full profile.

Related coverage

Notorious Spectre CPU vulnerability returns hitting JIT engines via side channel attacks | TechRadar

www.techradar.com

Notorious Spectre CPU vulnerability returns hitting JIT engines via side channel attacks | TechRadar

Read source