All countries

Silfio country intelligence · ZWE

Zimbabwe

2.4% annual new-conflict probability
Zimbabwe flag

How to read these probabilities: Scores estimate the probability of a new armed conflict starting within the next 12 months. Ongoing conflicts can have a saturation effect, reducing the modelled probability of an additional conflict onset. A low or falling score does not imply less severe ongoing fighting or a safer country.

Population

16.95M

GDP

$51.22B

Currency

BWP

Capital

Harare

Land area

390.76K km²

Official languages

Chewa, Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tsonga, Tswana, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language

Risk assessment

Risk profile

The 12-month probability of a new armed-conflict onset in Zimbabwe is 2.4%, representing a low risk. The country’s history of politically driven violence, including serious repression around the 2008 elections and the military-assisted leadership change of November 2017, supports continued sensitivity to political shocks. Economic hardship, weak institutions, and the security sector’s longstanding political influence are additional underlying risk factors.

Recent reporting reviewed contains no direct indication of organised armed mobilisation or imminent violence inside Zimbabwe. The available dated development is routine: Zimbabwe is participating in the UAE ODI Tri-Series with Bangladesh and Afghanistan on 19 October 2026. No prediction market is available for Zimbabwe, and there is no current evidence of an interstate confrontation involving Zimbabwean territory or a new domestic armed group.

The main uncertainty is whether a future succession dispute, disputed election, severe economic shock, or breakdown within the ruling and security establishments could convert political contestation into sustained violence. Risk would rise most clearly with attacks between organised domestic factions, military intervention accompanied by armed clashes, or cross-border fighting reaching Zimbabwe; it would be lower with orderly political transitions and continued containment of disputes through institutions.

Strategic reasoning

  • Zimbabwe’s record of election-related violence and the 2017 military intervention shows that political crises can involve coercive state forces, while the absence of a persistent insurgency keeps the current onset risk low.
  • Economic strain and institutional weakness can intensify grievances, but recent reporting provides no strong escalation signal; routine regional sporting engagement is consistent with continued normal state activity.

Critical indicators

  • On 19 October 2026, Zimbabwe began the UAE ODI Tri-Series against Bangladesh, alongside Afghanistan. The event is not a conflict indicator but shows no reported disruption from armed violence on Zimbabwean territory.
  • In November 2017, Zimbabwe’s armed forces placed pressure on President Robert Mugabe and helped produce a leadership change. That precedent matters because a future elite or succession crisis could again test the boundary between political intervention and armed domestic confrontation.

Probability trend

How the Zimbabwe estimate has moved

Probability2.4%2.4%2.4%

Sep 30

Oct 5

Oct 12

Oct 15

Oct 19

Date

Current conflicts

Source: UCDP

No active conflicts in Zimbabwe.

Regional context

Zimbabwe compared with its neighbours and region

Zimbabwe ranks number 83 of 196 in new conflict outbreak risk.

Figures are each country's modelled probability of a new armed conflict on its territory within the next 12 months. Select any country to open its full profile.

Related coverage

Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe Live Streaming, Match 1- Where to Watch UAE ODI Tri-Series 2026? | CREX

crex.com

Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe Live Streaming, Match 1- Where to Watch UAE ODI Tri-Series 2026? | CREX

Read source